You are in:Home/Publications/Application of Continuous Care Model on Health-Related Behaviors And Quality of Life Among Infertile Women

Dr. Rrehab Soliman Abdel alim :: Publications:

Title:
Application of Continuous Care Model on Health-Related Behaviors And Quality of Life Among Infertile Women
Authors: Rehab Soliman Abd El Aliem 1 , Amany Lotfy Ahmed 2, Shimaa Ahmed Sharaby 3
Year: 2023
Keywords: Continuous care model, health-related behaviors, quality of life, infertile women
Journal: International Egyptian Journal of Nursing Sciences and Research (IEJNSR)
Volume: 3
Issue: 2
Pages: 777-795
Publisher: Rehab Soliman Abd El Aliem
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Rrehab Soliman Abdel alim_3.pdf
Supplementary materials Rrehab Soliman Abdel alim_3.pdf
Abstract:

Female infertility is considered a crisis in women’s life and affects different aspects of their quality of life. Infertile women need to improve health-related behaviors and sustain the appropriate quality of life through continuous education. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of the application of a continuous care model on health-related behaviors and quality of life among infertile women. Design: A quasi-experimental design was utilized. Setting: The study was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic and In vitro fertilization ( IVF ) unit at Benha University Hospital. Sampling: A convenient sample of (80) infertile women attended the previously mentioned settings and was divided equally into control and intervention group. Tools: Three tools were used for data collection; a structured interviewing schedule, Health-related behaviors, and a quality of life (QOL) tool. Results: present a highly statistically significant improvement was revealed in the intervention group compared with the control group after implementing the continuous care model (p ≤0.001). Additionally, after the implementation of the continuous care model, the mean ±SD of total quality of life score in the intervention group was higher than the control group, which was (76.13 ± 8.36 versus 56.68 ± 3.92) respectively. Also, there was a highly statistically difference in the total quality of life scores of the intervention group more than the control group (p ≤0.001).

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus