You are in:Home/Publications/Early Postoperative Arrhythmias after Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients with Minitransseptal versus Left Atrial Approach

Dr. Moataz El shahat Rizk Mohamed :: Publications:

Title:
Early Postoperative Arrhythmias after Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients with Minitransseptal versus Left Atrial Approach
Authors: Moataz Rezk, MD
Year: 2015
Keywords: MINITRANSEPTAL, MVR, ARRHTHMIAS.
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Moataz El shahat Rizk Mohamed_1.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Objectives: The vertical transseptal approach has become popular because it offers excellent exposure of the mitral valve and it is easy to close. Despite the excellent view it affords, the vertical transseptal approach can result in postoperative sinus node dysfunction and dysrrhythmias. Methods: This prospective randomized study is to compare the postoperative outcome-mainly arrhythmia- in patient who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement using either minitransseptal approach or classic left atriotomy approach. All mitral valve disease patients with sinus rhythm were selected for this study. Patients with low EF, Ischemic mitral lesion and previous permanent pacemaker were excluded. Results: From June 2011 and July 2014 total120 patients with mitral valve disease underwent elective mitral valve replacement (MVR). Group A had 56 patients with a minitransseptal approach while group B had 64 patients with left atriotomy. There was no statistically significant difference between both group regarding preoperative and demographic data. No significant difference in Cross-clamp time (96.0±15.9 min in Group A versus 89.4±21.1 min in group B, P value = 0.13) and no difference in postoperative ventilation time (6.1±0.5 hours in Group A versus 5.0±0.2 hours in Group B, P value= 0.356). Three patients in Group A (5.36%) re-opened for bleeding versus one patient (1.57%) in Group B with no significant statistical difference, P value = 0.356. There was no significant difference in hospital stay (14.4±5.4 days in Group A versus 13.3±1.9 days in Group B, P value = 0.608. There was no statistical significance between the two groups regarding the patients' rhythm during weaning off bypass, during the ICU stay or after discharge. 15 Patients (27%) in group A while in group B 19 patients (29%) showed AF of previous sinus rhythm postoperatively which was non statistically significant. Conclusion: Minitransseptal approach does not increase the postoperative complications even postoperative arrhythmia when compared to classic left atriotomy approach. Nowadays many centers used the transseptal approach as a routine approach for mitral valve surgery.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus