You are in:Home/Publications/Comparative Study Following Addition of Epinephrine (0.2mg) to Spinal Hyperbaric Bupivacine (0.5%) in Normotensive and PreEclamptic Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Pilot Study

Dr. mohamed.almelegy :: Publications:

Title:
Comparative Study Following Addition of Epinephrine (0.2mg) to Spinal Hyperbaric Bupivacine (0.5%) in Normotensive and PreEclamptic Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Pilot Study
Authors: Mohamed Fouad Mohamed Elmeleigy*
Year: 2020
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper mohamed.almelegy_epinephrine CS 8888.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Introduction: Study compare effect of adding epinephrine to bupivacine-fentanyl mixture during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section in normotensive and pre-eclamptic parturients. Methods: Twenty parturients who had given their consent and were scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, where divided into four groups first group contain five normotensive parturients received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacine plus fentanyl, the second group also contain five normotensive parturients received 0.5% hyper bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture plus epinephrine (0.2mg), the third group contain five severe pre-eclamptic parturients received hyperbaric bupivacine 0.5% plus fentanyl, the fourth group contain five severe pre-eclamptic parturients received hyperbaric bupivacine- fentanyl mixture plus epinephrine (0.2mg). The hemodynamics, anesthesia characteristics and adverse effects were observed. Results: Mean heart rate didn’t significantly differ between groups either A, B or C and D. there is difference in percentage of drop of mean blood pressure from baseline between group A, B (statistically significance) and drop in C, D (not statistically significance). The anesthesia onset time for sensory block significantly (P=0.03) prolonged in group B than in group A (4.6±1.14 vs 2.8±0.84minute) and the same in group D than group C (4.2±0.45 vs 2.8±0.45min) (P=0.005), the time of sensory block to regress below L1 was significantly (P

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus