You are in:Home/Publications/Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stones: critical assessment of a randomized trial

Dr. Mohamed Abdel_rahman Alhefnawy :: Publications:

Title:
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stones: critical assessment of a randomized trial
Authors: K Noah;K Algamal; T Elliethy; W Saber; M Mobark ;M Alhefnawy
Year: 2025
Keywords: PCNL ;Renal stones ; ECIRS ; GMSV position ;Stone-free rate
Journal: International Urology and Nephrology
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Springer nature
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efcacy and safety of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-Modifed Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone position for managing complex kidney stones. Methods This prospective, randomized study was conducted in the urology departments of Benha University Hospital and Theodor Bilharz Research Institute between June 2021 and May 2024. A total of 60 patients with complex renal stones were randomly assigned to two groups (30 patients each). Group A underwent conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone position, while Group B underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-Modifed Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, and stone-free rates (SFR) were collected. Results No signifcant diferences were found between the two groups regarding preoperative demographic data and stone characteristics. However, operative time was signifcantly longer in the PCNL group (119±18 min) compared to the ECIRS group (105±14 min) (P=0.002). The number of punctures was also signifcantly higher in the PCNL group than in the ECIRS group (P=0.001). Immediate success was notably higher in the ECIRS group (83.3%) compared to the PCNL group (53.3%) (P=0.012). However, no signifcant diference was observed between the groups concerning eventual success (P=1.0). Conclusion ECIRS is a highly efective treatment for complex renal stones, delivering favorable outcomes such as higher single-step stone-free rates, a lower incidence of adverse events, and a reduced need for auxiliary procedures.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus