You are in:Home/Publications/Image-guided navigation in anterior cervical spine surgery using a cranial frame

Dr. ahmed rizk02 :: Publications:

Title:
Image-guided navigation in anterior cervical spine surgery using a cranial frame
Authors: Rizk AR1, Ottenbacher A2
Year: 2018
Keywords: navigation; 3D-fluoroscopy; cranial frame; anterior cervical surgery
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper ahmed rizk02_2.doc
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperative control of the implants. To ease this process, the surgeon can make use of the so called cranial frame which is attached to the Mayfield clamp, in combination with navigated 3D-fluoroscopy. The use of the cranial frame for navigated anterior craniocervical approaches as in case of transnasal procedures at the clivus and foramen magnum is quite widespread. In the literature the use of this technique for spine approaches is limited to a few case reports. Purpose: To present the feasibility of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation in anterior cervical spine procedures with the use of cranial frame. Study Design: Retrospective clinical case cohort Patients and Methods: We present our experience in the technique of navigation in 5 cases of anterior cervical spine procedures. Anterior instrumented fusion in the cervicothoracic spine was performed in 4 cases and in the last case anterior C1/2 fixation was performed. We used a system composed of Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm by Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany for acquisition of 3D images and the StealthStation system by Medtronic Inc., Louisville, USA for navigation. We used a so called cranial frame for navigation and that is fixed to the Mayfield head holder, a preoperative 3D scan was performed in some cases. The intraoperative 3D scan was performed after removal of the retractors, and additional 3D scan was beneficial in some cases during the surgical procedure. Results: Navigation was helpful in identification of the entry points and trajectories of the screws especially in the cervicothoracic region with no need for fluoroscopy. Additional advantage of the use of this system is the possibility of performing intraoperative 3D scan after instrumentation to verify hardware placement. Conclusion: The illustrated cases demonstrate the advantages of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation with use of the cranial frame in the upper transitional zones. Disadvantages of this method are the complex intraoperative draping and logistics, and the possible inaccuracy because of long distances and spinal mobility. Carbon Mayfield may facilitate positioning, but is not mandatory.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus