You are in:Home/Publications/Comparative study of different methods for colistin susceptibility in Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Ass. Lect. Mai Mohamed Kamal Mohamed Abdelfattah :: Publications:

Title:
Comparative study of different methods for colistin susceptibility in Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Authors: Soheir Abdelrahman Abdelsamie , Sahar Mohammed Fayed , Inas Abd Elmonem Ahmed , Mai Mohamed Kamal
Year: 2026
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Mai Mohamed Kamal Mohamed Abdelfattah_Manuscript Main File - R1 (1).pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: Various nosocomial illnesses have been linked to Acinetobacter baumannii, a prominent nosocomial pathogen. For the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, particularly the very resistant A. baumannii, colistin is now regarded as a treatment of last resort. In a time when MDR Gram-negative bacteria are becoming more prevalent and colistin resistance is also rising, a precise technique for measuring colistin's antimicrobial susceptibility is essential. The aim of this study is to evaluate the phenotypic colistin susceptibility testing methods in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) and to detect the underlying molecular presence of mcr-1 gene alongside these phenotypic methods. Methods: Gradient diffusion (E-test) and automated systems (Vitek-2, BD Phoenix™) were used to examine 50 non-repeated A. baumannii isolates, and the outcomes were compared to the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method which was performed according to ISO 20776-1 guidelines. Additionally, PCR was used to find the plasmidencoded mcr-1 gene. Results: The reference BMD method yielded 22% resistant isolates. E-test showed highest relative accuracy with 96% categorical agreement (CA), 86% essential agreement (EA), and 18.18% very major errors (VME), with no major errors (ME). Vitek-2 compact and BD Phoenix™ showed identical performance with a CA of 88%, EA of 76%, VME rates of 45.45%, and ME rates of 2.56%. Mcr-1 gene was found in 12% of isolates and was positive in 45.5% of colistin resistant strains. Conclusion: To fight against CRAB, laboratories should prioritize MIC-based accuracy over convenience to guide life-saving therapy. Compared to BMD as the reference method, E-test offers the highest relative accuracy followed by automated systems.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus