An Analytical Study Of The Role Of Agricultural Extension In The Development Of The Economics Of The Production Of Dairy Cattle In Some Parts Of The Arab Republic Of Egypt:


.

Author
Ph.D
Type
Benha University
University
Faculty
1981
Publish Year

Wiil is considered as one of the mest important el.ement inhu.m.a.n diflt, since it conta:i.nsthe essential f’::od nutriemtsneeded by children, adults and older people 0 It is genera1.~-,~rcomposed of body building proteins, bone bUlldll~ calcuim)health promoting vitamil,s and mineral saltS, and energy producingsugar 84d fats.Fr$ID the economoc point of view, milk production contributesconsidera; bly to the animal pr~ductj-~n i~c0me ~d consequentlYto the ~ricul tural. income. ; ~ Egypt, the level of ~ilk prnd~ction haS been raisedI during Ithe last 2 decades, but it is still lower than in thedevelo~ci d countriesl In spite of the achieved increase in theyearly Ii amourrt of milk produc tion;>e:rol>pitc e-m sumption is lowand betOW the standard. Statistical studie~ showed that thisestimafie decreased from 48.62 Kg in 1968 45.4 Kg in 1978 andis exprcted to be reduced to 43.6 Kg iL 1990 and to 42.5 KZin 20qIO~ This decrease in milk percapita consumption is mainly! due ti’ the rapid increase in the EgYl!tion human population.All t ese observations called for giving much efforts toincre se milk productivity of different ~_ivestock specieswhichi contribute to mt.Lk pron.ucti.on -i 1’1 tl-J..is country specially Due’ to the fact that 90 % of the local dairy cattle areovmed b,y; farmers, .the extension orgailization tried its bestfor raising the effeciency of milk production by encouragingfarmers to use Friesian bulls in crossbreeding their oows,toartificially insiminate them using Friesian Semen and to plantNapier Grass for feeding their dairy cattle in pummer.In~pite of the efforts made by the extension organizationin impr~ving the productivity of local dairy cattle, it isstill Ln ferior than that of european catt:le in the develppedcoUntries. This called the auther to study the role ofextent~pn organization in this respect.Research ObjectivesThe ob~ectives of this research can ’c e determined in recognj..z.ing:1- The iI role of extension means and methods as a source of!I • inf~rmation concerning milk productivity of Friesian cattleI . and I their crosses with Egyptian local cattle, artificialmination, and cultivating Napier grass.acles that encounter using 3rtificial inSeminationthe genetic merit of local dairy cattle.5- ect of orossing Looaf, dairy cattle with Friesian cattleon! milk prsdui tivi ty o:f ’the·locaJ..dair:f-_.cat-t1.e~characteristics of the faXJ.nerswho adopt ificial Lnaend nation by using Friesian semenforcultivating Napier grass.3- Di :ficuJ.ties that face the Egyption farmers when raisingcattle and their crosses with locol cattle- Research.HypotheseGThere : is a posi~ive relationship between tho dezree off armors a~opt i on of artificial- inSeJl]ination-.pis.c tice and theU’personal ~achteusticS.There is a positive re~ati8nship between orosaing andgrading E~yption catt~eand the deve~opment of their milkproducti~itY ~_d its econ~c returns~Research MethodsAfter determining objecti~esand setting hYPothesis of thostudY a questionnaire WaBdesigned for gettL~ neededinformations thi’ough inteJl’idewL1/; the ramp~e farmers inDemiatt a Governerate. The sample is composdedof 152 f=ors .who.ina~ted their cows a.I’tificial~y in the artificialinsemi~eXt .1-6a.a1:-2 .~-,. .t1lo;r’OughOt utheperiod !from 1978 to 1980 inclusive,AIj-”lysis of variance, Chi square and ~eaBt signUicant differrnIce tests were applied for the statistical analYsisof thei data. Results1.- ~’pnal_ chara.ctu.etucs~f the total. number of the farmers SB!IlP~eit wasobserred that 5~.97% titerate{KnoW how to read and-m:;j;e- -nell)6~.1 % were over 40 years o~d, 59.21% oValedlesS thnn 5 F~ddans.(l.16%possessed leSS than 10 farm aIdmels. 64. 48%li vea.in F .~ics of more than 4 chi1.dren, 61.008%had contacts withGJ.62% had f:onta.ctswith masS l~ediat 7.79% were meWeocal orgar!p.zationa, 1~.8% were joining political parties and100 % had $cceSS to the tovm.T,estiMs$ti3tical h’ypothese,E.; ..Acsu~ts of the statistical tests shoWQd that educ~~ionlevel, m~Imbership in social organization and politicalparties, ¥i ze of farm animal ownership e,q>osure to mass l!lidea,I cosmopoli~ance, a.”l.tdhe un-twe of cows in field work, hadhighly s~ificro,t Effects, (r.O•Ol) ,mile ege of.the parmers contact!4g with changing egents had only significant effect(P;O.{)~Jon the degree of adopting artificial inseminatiorh..~ On the ccn-trdrJl size of the fa.~ly, size of the land owners~PIownership of tractors ~d irrigation machines, source ofobtaining Freaisian crossbreed CoYlS , the distance between ffarmers homes and the vetrtnary unit had no picnifiCant effectin adop~ing artiIicial insemnation.~lYsis of variance proved that Friesian corssoereedSsurpassed SignificantlY ( P.O.O~) local c~ttle in milk .product~vitY per head/year.T~e annual net inCone was ~S9.47 poundS per head of theFriesi4n crossbEBeds and anly 7.45 poundS per head of thelocal ~attJ.e.3- ~~noion teach!ng met~odS:I T~e extention teaching methods cou~d bearranged o.CC ording·{5)to i:llor3!”5 t:,. foxnors with =~~t1.D”-’]i’ri e~i,,”’ caH le o.;ld thei” sr:>eSas >’1th 1oc0.1 MVlS, ”””li!chDJJ&i.nb D.G O:tJ.S C0.,,10 fir St (19 •Mb)t:lO:J.f 011- owed byNl.:JL t i.ve S =d. II oig,h.J:rousr (1.9.01) a:J.d. fi” f J-ly t eJ.eviai!).b- For inIorillinS Oll Friesian cattle ”,,~dthoir c~ss~s withuco.l cattlo. roldives and lloi.:;b.bOurs co.;11efirst,(34.22,,) t~Cll followed by socio.l eh~O or~aniza~o.nd fil’l311,1 ro,di~ (3. 95~~).,*ors as follow”: cbDnVor; .,gent s (51. 16;,), relJ:cl;.1’w’eJltWdnei:;b.b:JID’S (36 .oa;;), nocio.l ch~e circo.:rl.ZetioilS(~” 25,;), ezt on”Lon .ur;o.z Lr es (4. 3e.» , ””,i finnllYtiolovisi ~D. (l. 75 ~S).4- ~~bO@ for ut~zjp’; nrt1ficio.l~o~tioa:C- l:>c l:J11e dint”,,’co between formal’S hoJ.oS ”””ldthevetr:tne.r.1F! ’it ””s· the obstacle facinG 33.55”, of the f3r,erB of!Ithe sol1:;?lc.;...”bi11ty of se:len an.dtechnicians for artificoJ.Ii::l3e:;rl.;:l.o,L:>i:;J1. the prtJ)or ti;J.e was the probleill of 72.S s. dbfiicul ty 0f 33. 55 ’,~ of t~le so.~x:)l:J.d- ~h” ?”eseuco ef loc~ bulls tu thcSt30lo .nceur~e~ fhegrasD caused d:ifficlUes fer 11.4) ~;e.”l~ 25 ~, ’)f t11eso.:~lple reSpectivelS’·6- pgLi.9_~j;_~ ~~..aL~’1..U~. 42.t~.e~ll_!.o.:’L.s-~!’}”1-_~.~~,g].:913A-e..l;J.:Fifty 0ae far~ers indicated thut raisinG Friosian crJsses he.ve ””on fnced w1. th SO’01ed:1fficult1.es, ). 92’-15.68,5.1.96, 7.15, 5,86 and 58; 6),’ of t:”’Dl defined t:J.o difi.igll,.J.-tLilBnobe duo to :n:ilk fever r: ari.lk·fP-7,.r -wi’- ,,::Io :l-o”’~ of: :foo~, .!Jj,SBas-es-e.;ldlo”,level of nutri tUn, d:1seases, =o,da;>t0.0L-i tyt o c1i:l1Cttc Mnditi ens, lack of f 0 od, lac:r ef feod X’d theneoesS ty fer ,’0100 eforts in cleo”un:; o.nd husbandry. rea:;>eot:l-vel:’Researoh. Rec0:a;:,l9nQ2.ti 0:1it is advisable ta reco~nise tho farJc~s having the~haract3Xiat:Les leaiJ.ing to lliE,h d<;gree ef a,de”tien as sh::Hl”-inthe re~e~ich results.2- Su~stitut’ng l’)co.l cattlo with Frieaicn crossbreedei s~l?uld teJ.:e?~8.Gg,!J- ’Llo ”yehle”’” ef applying Artiftcial inse:n1=tie” and calttvo,ting :1e,:;>iergrtillS suchp~0ctices should be onc~urnged. 

Abstract
Attachments


Seacrch again